Skip to main content

Unpacking Shopping Bag Charges: Recent Bangalore Consumer Court Ruling


This is an important update to the August 2023 blog post, "Shopping Bag Charges from a Legal Perspective," where I delved into the dynamics between consumer rights, trademark laws, and retail practices. In that piece, I discussed how the common practice of charging for branded bags as an extension of a brand's identity was considered legitimate by large retail chains.
Link to the August 2023 post: https://www.ampslegal.in/2023/08/shopping-bag-charges-from-legal.html

Fast forward to now, and a significant development following a recent ruling by the Bangalore Consumer Court. This ruling challenges the legitimacy of charging customers for what has been considered a promotional item – a shopping bag printed with a brand's logo.

In this case, a Bengaluru resident took furniture giant Ikea to court for charging ₹20 for a carry bag with the company logo. She visited the store in October 2022, where she purchased items worth ₹2,428. However, she was charged an additional ₹20 for a carry bag.

Upon questioning the staff about this charge, she expressed her concern and requested that the carry bag be provided for free to customers. Despite her objections, the employees insisted that it was their policy, and she ended up paying the amount.

Later, 11 days after the purchase, she demanded a refund and sent a legal notice to Ikea, arguing that mandating a carry bag with the company logo for all customers amounted to "advertising," which she considered "spurious" and an "unfair trade practice." The court ruled in her favour, stating that Ikea was guilty of unfair trade practice, emphasizing that the seller is responsible for covering all expenses related to delivering goods to the customer.

In simple terms, the court found Ikea at fault for making customers pay for a carry bag with the company logo, considering it an unfair trade practice. The judgment reinforces that sellers should cover the expenses associated with providing goods to customers. As a result, the Consumer Court granted relief of ₹3,020 to her.

In conclusion, this judgement against Ikea sheds light on the importance of consumer rights and fair trade practices. The court's ruling underscores that businesses, even global giants, are obligated to bear the expenses related to delivering goods to customers. This decision reaffirms the principle that consumers should not be unfairly burdened with additional charges for essential items like carry bags.

As I unpack the implications of this recent judgment, I explore how routine transactions are continually reshaped by the evolving landscape of the law.

[Sangeeta Bohra vs. Ikea India Private Limited CC No. 73/2023 dated 4th October 2023 (Bangalore Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission)]



Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousNov 23, 2023, 4:54:00 PM

    Good information and articulation! 💐👍

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maintenance Charges Default: No Water, No Sympathy

In what can only be described as a case of forum shopping (trying to find the friendliest court), an apartment owner in Shiv Vihar CHS, Dombivali (East), took his complaints on a legal tour. The petitioner, Vilas Gopal Dongare member of the society was unhappy. Why? Because his water supply was cut off. The reason? He had not paid his maintenance bills, which had piled up to a whopping Rs. 7 Lakhs! Despite making several complaints about the alleged harassment by the society and even a water tank causing structural issues in his building, his cries were heard and promptly dismissed. The Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission looked into his case and, on 05.02.2020, decided it was not a human rights violation. They said, “Pay your bills first.” The society initiated proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act) to recover arrears and got a Recovery Certificate issued in its favour. When the petitioner’s appeal against this certificate wa...
Post a Comment
Read more

AMORTISED COST CALCULATION: THE EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE (EIR)

IAS 39 mandates some financial assets and liabilities to be subsequently measured at ‘amortized cost’.  This measurement concept is a management theory put in accounting practice. It means that the contractual interest rate each period should be adjusted to amortize the transaction costs over the expected life of the financial instrument. The amortization is calculated on an effective interest rate (EIR) / yield-to-maturity (YTM) basis. The EIR is the rate that exactly discounts the stream of principal and interest cash flows excluding any impact of credit losses, to the initial net proceeds. It is important to note that EIR method does not take into account any future credit impairments anticipated on that instrument. The carrying amount of the financial instrument subsequently measured at amortized cost is computed as: Transaction costs are an integral part of the amortized cost calculation. They are defined as costs that are directly attributable to the acquisit...
49 comments
Read more

Court Upholds Co-operative Membership Transfer with Release Deed

In the case of Bima Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Divisional Joint Registrar & Ors. WP 10768 of 2024 , the Bombay High Court on 23.09.2024 dismissed the society’s petition challenging the membership transfer to Pushpa Morey, a widow, following her husband's death. Initially, Pushpa was granted provisional membership but was later denied full membership by the society. Pushpa applied for full membership after her husband's passing. When the society refused, she sought help from the Deputy Registrar, who ordered that the society admit her as a full member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The society’s appeal to the Divisional Joint Registrar was unsuccessful, prompting the writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The society argued that the "family arrangement" concept under Section 154B-13 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act applies only to a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Pushpa, however, contended tha...
2 comments
Read more