Skip to main content

Shopping Bag Charges from a Legal Perspective

 🚨 Update Alert! 🚨

Read the latest addendum to 'Shopping Bag Charges from Legal Perspective' for a game-changing insight from the recent Bangalore Consumer Court judgment. 🛍️✨ #LegalUpdate Link to the November 2023 post: https://www.ampslegal.in/2023/11/unpacking-shopping-bag-charges-recent.html

My recent visit to the IKEA store taught me that every action of ours has a section in law. As I made my way to the checkout counter, I was presented with a unique scenario – the option to purchase a shopping bag featuring the store's logo for a nominal cost. This seemingly mundane transaction triggered a cascade of inter-connected questions ranging from environmental awareness, and consumer rights to marketing tactics in my legal-oriented mind.

Why would a store charge customers for a bag that essentially served as a walking advertisement for their brand? It was a question that sparked a conversation with the store manager, who graciously explained their perspective.

"The shopping bags, with our trademarked logo, are considered an extension of our brand's identity," the manager informed me. "As such, they are treated as goods of the store and are subject to a nominal charge."

A pivotal query arises: Are the shopping bags offered by retail stores considered goods? In a case involving Big Bazaar (Future Retail Ltd.) Vs. Ashok, F.A. No.238/2019, the National Consumer Disputes Forum declared that shopping bags indeed qualify as 'goods.' They ruled that stores can charge for these bags, provided they clearly inform customers via visible notices in their store. This acknowledgement transforms shopping bags into commodities that brands can treat like any other product, as ruled in Gaurav Bangia v. Decathlon Sports India Private Limited, District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gurgaon, CC No 747 of 2019, where a biodegradable shopping bag with a logo was sold by the store and the Consumer Forum emphasized that customers deserve to know about charges before they commit to purchasing. Lack of such disclosure constitutes unfair practice. If consumers are informed and still make their purchases, branding and charging for bags cease to be unfair practices.

With the push for eco-friendly practices due to plastic bans, brands invest in eco-friendly bag alternatives. This is a resource-intensive process that takes time and funds. In this context, eco-friendly bags become commodities subject to charges, not undue profiteering.

In the dance between trademark rights and consumer rights, shopping bags turn out to be more important than we think. They're not just bags – they're also part of legal discussions, what customers expect, and how brands show who they are. This shows us that even small things are connected to the law in big ways. 


Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maintenance Charges Default: No Water, No Sympathy

In what can only be described as a case of forum shopping (trying to find the friendliest court), an apartment owner in Shiv Vihar CHS, Dombivali (East), took his complaints on a legal tour. The petitioner, Vilas Gopal Dongare member of the society was unhappy. Why? Because his water supply was cut off. The reason? He had not paid his maintenance bills, which had piled up to a whopping Rs. 7 Lakhs! Despite making several complaints about the alleged harassment by the society and even a water tank causing structural issues in his building, his cries were heard and promptly dismissed. The Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission looked into his case and, on 05.02.2020, decided it was not a human rights violation. They said, “Pay your bills first.” The society initiated proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act) to recover arrears and got a Recovery Certificate issued in its favour. When the petitioner’s appeal against this certificate wa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Court Upholds Co-operative Membership Transfer with Release Deed

In the case of Bima Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Divisional Joint Registrar & Ors. WP 10768 of 2024 , the Bombay High Court on 23.09.2024 dismissed the society’s petition challenging the membership transfer to Pushpa Morey, a widow, following her husband's death. Initially, Pushpa was granted provisional membership but was later denied full membership by the society. Pushpa applied for full membership after her husband's passing. When the society refused, she sought help from the Deputy Registrar, who ordered that the society admit her as a full member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The society’s appeal to the Divisional Joint Registrar was unsuccessful, prompting the writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The society argued that the "family arrangement" concept under Section 154B-13 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act applies only to a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Pushpa, however, contended tha...
2 comments
Read more

AMORTISED COST CALCULATION: THE EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE (EIR)

IAS 39 mandates some financial assets and liabilities to be subsequently measured at ‘amortized cost’.  This measurement concept is a management theory put in accounting practice. It means that the contractual interest rate each period should be adjusted to amortize the transaction costs over the expected life of the financial instrument. The amortization is calculated on an effective interest rate (EIR) / yield-to-maturity (YTM) basis. The EIR is the rate that exactly discounts the stream of principal and interest cash flows excluding any impact of credit losses, to the initial net proceeds. It is important to note that EIR method does not take into account any future credit impairments anticipated on that instrument. The carrying amount of the financial instrument subsequently measured at amortized cost is computed as: Transaction costs are an integral part of the amortized cost calculation. They are defined as costs that are directly attributable to the acquisit...
49 comments
Read more