Skip to main content

Taking Control of Your Final Chapter: Living Will


I first learned about living wills when a newspaper article “Renowned gynaecologist registers living will” caught my attention. Then of course, at one of the OTT platforms I saw the movie “Salam Venky” based on the true story of a 25-year-old chess player Kolavennu Venkatesh from Hyderabad who in 2004 pleaded to be euthanised.

Almost after 14 years, in March 2018, the Supreme Court of India issued a landmark judgement recognizing the right to die with dignity and allowing for passive euthanasia in certain circumstances. The judgement, passed by a five-judge Constitution Bench led by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, held that "the right to life includes the right to die with dignity" and that individuals have the right to refuse medical treatment or life support in cases of terminal illness or irreversible coma.

The case was brought to the Supreme Court by a non-governmental organization called Common Cause, which argued that the right to die with dignity was a fundamental right under the Constitution of India. The Court agreed, stating that "a dying patient who is terminally ill or in a permanent vegetative state can make an informed decision to refuse or withdraw medical treatment or artificial life support." The Court also laid down guidelines for the procedure to be followed in cases of passive euthanasia, including the requirement for a medical board to assess the patient's condition and the need for judicial oversight to prevent abuse.

The legal recognition of living wills is relatively new, but it has already had a significant impact on the way that individuals think about end-of-life care.  A living will is a legal document that allows individuals to express their wishes regarding medical treatment if they become incapacitated and cannot communicate their preferences. In India, living wills are also known as "advance directives" and are recognized under the law.

One of the key benefits of having a living will is that it allows individuals to retain control over their medical treatment even if they are unable to communicate their preferences at the time. As Chief Justice of India, D.Y. Chandrachud, explains: "The right to die with dignity is a fundamental right, and living wills are an important step towards ensuring that individuals have the autonomy to make decisions about their medical treatment."

 At first, I was hesitant about the idea of making a living will. It seemed like a morbid topic to think about, and I didn't want to imagine myself in a situation where I would need one. But as I thought about it more, I realized that having a living will be empowering. In a living will I can specify the medical treatments that I’d like to receive or refuse, in case of terminal illness or a persistent vegetative state. This can include decisions about life support, resuscitation, and other forms of medical intervention.

Making a living will was a simple process, but it gave me a sense of peace and control over my own life. It's a small step that we can all take to ensure that our preferences for medical treatment are respected and to avoid any potential conflicts or confusion among family members and healthcare providers. Your voice matters, and living will help ensure that your wishes are heard, even when you can't speak for yourself.

In conclusion, the judgement in Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of India and Another, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 215 of 2005, 2018 SCC OnLine SC 208, paved the way for the legal recognition of living wills in India as a valid means that empowers individuals to make informed decisions about their medical treatment and retain control over their own lives.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maintenance Charges Default: No Water, No Sympathy

In what can only be described as a case of forum shopping (trying to find the friendliest court), an apartment owner in Shiv Vihar CHS, Dombivali (East), took his complaints on a legal tour. The petitioner, Vilas Gopal Dongare member of the society was unhappy. Why? Because his water supply was cut off. The reason? He had not paid his maintenance bills, which had piled up to a whopping Rs. 7 Lakhs! Despite making several complaints about the alleged harassment by the society and even a water tank causing structural issues in his building, his cries were heard and promptly dismissed. The Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission looked into his case and, on 05.02.2020, decided it was not a human rights violation. They said, “Pay your bills first.” The society initiated proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act) to recover arrears and got a Recovery Certificate issued in its favour. When the petitioner’s appeal against this certificate wa...

AMORTISED COST CALCULATION: THE EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE (EIR)

IAS 39 mandates some financial assets and liabilities to be subsequently measured at ‘amortized cost’.  This measurement concept is a management theory put in accounting practice. It means that the contractual interest rate each period should be adjusted to amortize the transaction costs over the expected life of the financial instrument. The amortization is calculated on an effective interest rate (EIR) / yield-to-maturity (YTM) basis. The EIR is the rate that exactly discounts the stream of principal and interest cash flows excluding any impact of credit losses, to the initial net proceeds. It is important to note that EIR method does not take into account any future credit impairments anticipated on that instrument. The carrying amount of the financial instrument subsequently measured at amortized cost is computed as: Transaction costs are an integral part of the amortized cost calculation. They are defined as costs that are directly attributable to the acquisit...

Court Upholds Co-operative Membership Transfer with Release Deed

In the case of Bima Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Divisional Joint Registrar & Ors. WP 10768 of 2024 , the Bombay High Court on 23.09.2024 dismissed the society’s petition challenging the membership transfer to Pushpa Morey, a widow, following her husband's death. Initially, Pushpa was granted provisional membership but was later denied full membership by the society. Pushpa applied for full membership after her husband's passing. When the society refused, she sought help from the Deputy Registrar, who ordered that the society admit her as a full member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The society’s appeal to the Divisional Joint Registrar was unsuccessful, prompting the writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The society argued that the "family arrangement" concept under Section 154B-13 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act applies only to a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Pushpa, however, contended tha...