Skip to main content

Nominee or Legal Heir: Who Gets The Cooperative Housing Society Flat?

The Bombay High Court recently clarified the legal standing of a nominee versus legal heirs in a dispute over a flat in Mumbai. This case, Karan Vishnu Khandelwal v. Hon’ble Chairman/Secretary Vaikunth (Andheri) Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. (Writ Petition No. 12468 of 2022 dated 10 November 2022), highlighted the complexities surrounding property inheritance within cooperative housing societies.


Case Background

The deceased, MK, was the owner of a flat in a cooperative housing society in Mumbai. During his lifetime, MK had nominated his grandson VK as the nominee for the flat, and this nomination was duly recorded in the society's register. MK passed away intestate (without a will), leaving behind two sons, RK and KK, and his grandson VK, whose father was MK's predeceased son.

Following MK's demise, RK obtained a no-objection declaration from his brother KK and claimed a 2/3rd share in the flat. He sought the transfer of this proportionate interest from the housing society. However, the society rejected RK's application, citing the Supreme Court's ruling in Indrani Wahi v. Registrar of Cooperative Societies (Civil Appeal 4930/2006). This ruling held that while a cooperative society must recognize a valid nomination, the nominee does not become the owner but holds the property in trust for the legal heirs.

Legal Provisions

The case also examined Section 154B-13 under Chapter XXIII-B of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Act, 2019, which became effective on 9th March 2019. This provision is clear in stating that a nominee acts as a trustee for the legal heirs and does not automatically gain ownership rights.

Court's Decision

In the current case, the Bombay High Court directed the society to transfer the flat to VK in his capacity as the nominee and admit him as a provisional member. This arrangement was to remain until RK obtained a succession certificate, legal heirship certificate, or testamentary document.

The court emphasized that a nominee holds the property in trust and cannot acquire ownership rights solely based on the nomination.

This ruling reaffirms the distinction between a nominee and a legal heir, ensuring that the property rights of legal heirs are protected while maintaining the administrative role of the nominee within cooperative societies.

Citations

  1. Indrani Wahi v. Registrar of Cooperative Societies (Civil Appeal 4930/2006)
  2. Karan Vishnu Khandelwal v. Hon’ble Chairman/Secretary Vaikunth (Andheri) Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. & Ors. (Writ Petition No. 12468 of 2022, dated 10 November 2022)
  3. Maharashtra Cooperative Societies (Amendment) Act, 2019

Comments

  1. Also view the case of Indrani Wahi vs. DEPTY REGISTRA OF COOP HSG SOC &OTHER S (SC) 4646 of 2006 civil appeal

    ReplyDelete
  2. Informant best 👍👍👍

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maintenance Charges Default: No Water, No Sympathy

In what can only be described as a case of forum shopping (trying to find the friendliest court), an apartment owner in Shiv Vihar CHS, Dombivali (East), took his complaints on a legal tour. The petitioner, Vilas Gopal Dongare member of the society was unhappy. Why? Because his water supply was cut off. The reason? He had not paid his maintenance bills, which had piled up to a whopping Rs. 7 Lakhs! Despite making several complaints about the alleged harassment by the society and even a water tank causing structural issues in his building, his cries were heard and promptly dismissed. The Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission looked into his case and, on 05.02.2020, decided it was not a human rights violation. They said, “Pay your bills first.” The society initiated proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act) to recover arrears and got a Recovery Certificate issued in its favour. When the petitioner’s appeal against this certificate wa...

AMORTISED COST CALCULATION: THE EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE (EIR)

IAS 39 mandates some financial assets and liabilities to be subsequently measured at ‘amortized cost’.  This measurement concept is a management theory put in accounting practice. It means that the contractual interest rate each period should be adjusted to amortize the transaction costs over the expected life of the financial instrument. The amortization is calculated on an effective interest rate (EIR) / yield-to-maturity (YTM) basis. The EIR is the rate that exactly discounts the stream of principal and interest cash flows excluding any impact of credit losses, to the initial net proceeds. It is important to note that EIR method does not take into account any future credit impairments anticipated on that instrument. The carrying amount of the financial instrument subsequently measured at amortized cost is computed as: Transaction costs are an integral part of the amortized cost calculation. They are defined as costs that are directly attributable to the acquisit...

Court Upholds Co-operative Membership Transfer with Release Deed

In the case of Bima Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Divisional Joint Registrar & Ors. WP 10768 of 2024 , the Bombay High Court on 23.09.2024 dismissed the society’s petition challenging the membership transfer to Pushpa Morey, a widow, following her husband's death. Initially, Pushpa was granted provisional membership but was later denied full membership by the society. Pushpa applied for full membership after her husband's passing. When the society refused, she sought help from the Deputy Registrar, who ordered that the society admit her as a full member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The society’s appeal to the Divisional Joint Registrar was unsuccessful, prompting the writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The society argued that the "family arrangement" concept under Section 154B-13 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act applies only to a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Pushpa, however, contended tha...