Skip to main content

New Schedule VI – Generally Asked Questions & Answers (GAQA)




In the Part 1 and Part 2 of the ‘Ten Minutes’ series of New Schedule VI an overview of the Balance sheet and Profit and Loss account changes were dealt with. In this last Part I’d like to touch upon my perspective of certain practical issues in putting Schedule VI in place.

Issue 1:
The aggregate amount of both long term and shot term loans guaranteed by directors or “others” under each head is to be disclosed. Who does this “others” signify?
Solution:
The words “others” would mean any person or entity other than a director. It is therefore, not restricted to mean only promoters or related parties. In the normal course, a person or entity will generally guarantee a loan of the company only if it is associated with the company in some manner.

Issue 2:
A liability is to be classified as current if the company has an unconditional right to defer its settlement for at least 12 months after the reporting date. How will a 5-year loan which the company has taken is repayable on demand? Based on the past experience, it is not expected that the lender will demand the repayment within next 12 months.
Solution:
As the company does not have an unconditional right to defer the settlement of loan for at least 12 months after the reporting date, it will classify the loan as current. This is despite the fact that based on the past experience, it is not expected that the lender will demand the repayment within the next 12 months.

Issue 3:
Do we need to classify Capital advances between non-current and current categories? If yes, on what basis?
Solution:
Capital advances are advances given for procurement of fixed assets which are non-current assets. Companies do not expect to realize them in cash in the next 12 months or within their normal operating cycle. Rather, over the period, these get categorized as one or more fixed assets. Hence capital advances should be treated as non-current assets.

Issue 4:
In the New Schedule VI “Proposed Dividend” needs to be disclosed in the footnotes. Earlier proposed dividend was being disclosed under the head “Provisions”. Does it mean that proposed dividend is not required to be provided for going forward?
Solution:
The Indian Accounting Standard (AS) 4 – Contingencies and Events Occurring after the Balance Sheet date requires that dividends in respect of the period covered by the financial statements, which are proposed or declared by the company after the balance sheet date but before approval of financial statements, should be adjusted. The new schedule VI has stated an accounting standards override. This simply means that accounting standards will override the New Schedule. The companies will have to continue to create a provision for dividends in respect of the periods covered by the financial statements and disclose the same as provision in the balance sheet. 

Comments

  1. CA Pooja....I am expecting big from you....Because you are women and women can get great changes and do something good for the nation....You have that Positive Aura and really you have to show your great calculated aggressiveness in right direction and momentum......I hope to see you doing big....I am doing my course of action.....God Bless :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. @CA Raj Abnormes..Thank ya very much for your comment..Now that I've pledged to be in the public arena for serving our profession I look forward to your support in my endevours..From my side I can promise that I'll never let you or our profession down!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maintenance Charges Default: No Water, No Sympathy

In what can only be described as a case of forum shopping (trying to find the friendliest court), an apartment owner in Shiv Vihar CHS, Dombivali (East), took his complaints on a legal tour. The petitioner, Vilas Gopal Dongare member of the society was unhappy. Why? Because his water supply was cut off. The reason? He had not paid his maintenance bills, which had piled up to a whopping Rs. 7 Lakhs! Despite making several complaints about the alleged harassment by the society and even a water tank causing structural issues in his building, his cries were heard and promptly dismissed. The Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission looked into his case and, on 05.02.2020, decided it was not a human rights violation. They said, “Pay your bills first.” The society initiated proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act) to recover arrears and got a Recovery Certificate issued in its favour. When the petitioner’s appeal against this certificate wa...

AMORTISED COST CALCULATION: THE EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE (EIR)

IAS 39 mandates some financial assets and liabilities to be subsequently measured at ‘amortized cost’.  This measurement concept is a management theory put in accounting practice. It means that the contractual interest rate each period should be adjusted to amortize the transaction costs over the expected life of the financial instrument. The amortization is calculated on an effective interest rate (EIR) / yield-to-maturity (YTM) basis. The EIR is the rate that exactly discounts the stream of principal and interest cash flows excluding any impact of credit losses, to the initial net proceeds. It is important to note that EIR method does not take into account any future credit impairments anticipated on that instrument. The carrying amount of the financial instrument subsequently measured at amortized cost is computed as: Transaction costs are an integral part of the amortized cost calculation. They are defined as costs that are directly attributable to the acquisit...

Court Upholds Co-operative Membership Transfer with Release Deed

In the case of Bima Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Divisional Joint Registrar & Ors. WP 10768 of 2024 , the Bombay High Court on 23.09.2024 dismissed the society’s petition challenging the membership transfer to Pushpa Morey, a widow, following her husband's death. Initially, Pushpa was granted provisional membership but was later denied full membership by the society. Pushpa applied for full membership after her husband's passing. When the society refused, she sought help from the Deputy Registrar, who ordered that the society admit her as a full member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The society’s appeal to the Divisional Joint Registrar was unsuccessful, prompting the writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The society argued that the "family arrangement" concept under Section 154B-13 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act applies only to a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Pushpa, however, contended tha...