Skip to main content

Presentation of Financial Instruments - Liability vs. Equity

Because investors rely on accounting information to make their investment decisions, it is important for accounting information to present items according to their substance, and not merely their legal form. Some financial instruments have the legal form of equity but are in substance, liabilities.

Under IFRS the issuer should classify the instrument, or its component parts, as a financial liability or equity in accordance with the ‘substance’ of contractual arrangement on initial recognition, and the definitions of financial liability and an equity instrument. The classification is made at the date of issue and is not revised later.

The critical feature in differentiating a financial liability from an equity instrument is the existence of a contractual obligation on one party to the financial instrument (the issuer) either to deliver cash or another financial asset to the other party (the holder) or to exchange another financial instrument with the holder under potentially unfavorable conditions.

Note that a restriction on the ability of the issuer to satisfy an obligation, such as lack of access to foreign currency to repay a foreign currency loan, does not negate the existence of liability.

Scenario: An obligation to pay dividends

IStaR Ltd. issues 100,000 preference shares with a fixed rate of dividend @ 7% at par for INR 1 million. According to the terms of the contract, the directors of IStaR Ltd. have to compulsorily pay dividend following the date of issue.

Solution:

In substance, ‘preference share’ issue is a liability as IStaR Ltd. has a contractual obligation to deliver cash to the holder of preference shares by way of dividends. In short, only if the distributions to the holders of preference shares, whether cumulative or non-cumulative, are at the discretion of the issuer, then the shares are equity instruments.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maintenance Charges Default: No Water, No Sympathy

In what can only be described as a case of forum shopping (trying to find the friendliest court), an apartment owner in Shiv Vihar CHS, Dombivali (East), took his complaints on a legal tour. The petitioner, Vilas Gopal Dongare member of the society was unhappy. Why? Because his water supply was cut off. The reason? He had not paid his maintenance bills, which had piled up to a whopping Rs. 7 Lakhs! Despite making several complaints about the alleged harassment by the society and even a water tank causing structural issues in his building, his cries were heard and promptly dismissed. The Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission looked into his case and, on 05.02.2020, decided it was not a human rights violation. They said, “Pay your bills first.” The society initiated proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act) to recover arrears and got a Recovery Certificate issued in its favour. When the petitioner’s appeal against this certificate wa...

AMORTISED COST CALCULATION: THE EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE (EIR)

IAS 39 mandates some financial assets and liabilities to be subsequently measured at ‘amortized cost’.  This measurement concept is a management theory put in accounting practice. It means that the contractual interest rate each period should be adjusted to amortize the transaction costs over the expected life of the financial instrument. The amortization is calculated on an effective interest rate (EIR) / yield-to-maturity (YTM) basis. The EIR is the rate that exactly discounts the stream of principal and interest cash flows excluding any impact of credit losses, to the initial net proceeds. It is important to note that EIR method does not take into account any future credit impairments anticipated on that instrument. The carrying amount of the financial instrument subsequently measured at amortized cost is computed as: Transaction costs are an integral part of the amortized cost calculation. They are defined as costs that are directly attributable to the acquisit...

Court Upholds Co-operative Membership Transfer with Release Deed

In the case of Bima Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Divisional Joint Registrar & Ors. WP 10768 of 2024 , the Bombay High Court on 23.09.2024 dismissed the society’s petition challenging the membership transfer to Pushpa Morey, a widow, following her husband's death. Initially, Pushpa was granted provisional membership but was later denied full membership by the society. Pushpa applied for full membership after her husband's passing. When the society refused, she sought help from the Deputy Registrar, who ordered that the society admit her as a full member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The society’s appeal to the Divisional Joint Registrar was unsuccessful, prompting the writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The society argued that the "family arrangement" concept under Section 154B-13 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act applies only to a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Pushpa, however, contended tha...