Skip to main content

Day 1 Profit or Loss

The transaction price (i.e. consideration given towards assets and consideration received towards liabilities) is normally the best evidence of the fair value of a financial instrument at initial recognition.

An exception to this general rule exists where the fair value of an instrument is evidenced by comparison with other observable current market transactions in the same instrument (i.e. without modification or repackaging) or based on valuation technique whose variables include only data from observable markets.

Where there is strong, market-based evidence of the fair value of the financial instrument, the instrument is initially recognized at the fair value and an immediate day 1 profit and loss may arise. Using unobservable inputs to calculate a fair value different to the transaction price on day 1 involves a high degree of subjectivity and therefore this cannot be used as fair value on initial recognition of a financial instrument. In such a situation, the instrument is initially recognized at its transaction price, and consequently day 1 profit and loss would not be recognized upon initial recognition.

When day 1 profit and loss has not been recognized for the above reason and therefore included in the initial carrying amount, IAS 39 requires a gain or loss to be recognized subsequently only to the extent that it arises from a change in a factor (including time) that market participants would consider in setting a price.

However, the standards do not further elaborate what constitutes a change in a factor. Since there is little clarity as to when this “hidden” day 1 profit and loss can be recognized, this day 1 profit and loss could be deferred until all market inputs become observable, or instead released over the life of the instrument on a systematic basis.

For example, a bank charges a fee for issuing a short-term loan commitment that is higher than the bank’s estimate of the fair value of the loan commitment using its proprietary valuation model. The bank does not recognize an upfront gain but measures the derivative loan commitment at the transaction price.

The bank should recognize in earnings observable changes in the fair value of the derivative that have occurred subsequent to initial recognition that a market participant would consider in setting a price. Unless the bank can demonstrate objectively that the fair value of the derivative loan commitment has changed due to changes in mortgage rates or other factors (that would qualify as observable market data) occurring subsequent to initial recognition, the bank should not recognize a change in the fair value of the loan commitment as profit.

To illustrate, the bank received `500,000 to issue the loan commitment and the bank’s proprietary model valued the commitment at `300,000. The bank would initially recognize a derivative liability at `500,000 equivalent to the cash received. Assume that at the next measurement date, adjusting the valuation model for observable market changes, the estimated value was `200,000 (a decrease of `100,000 from the previous model estimate). The bank reduces the derivative liability to `400,000 and recognizes `100,000 as a fair value movement in earnings. The initial difference of `200,000 (`500,000 minus `300,000) can be either amortized or deferred (and recognized in profit or loss at the maturity date if the loan commitment was not exercised, or included in the carrying amount of the loan and recognized in profit or loss through the effective interest rate, if the loan commitment was exercised).

In accordance with IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures, if such day 1 profit and loss exists, an entity shall disclose by class of financial instrument a) its accounting policy for recognizing that difference in profit or loss to reflect a change in factors (including time) that market participants would consider in setting a price and b) the aggregate difference yet to be recognized in profit or loss at the beginning and end of the period and a reconciliation of changes in the balance of this difference.

Comments

  1. Hi Pooja, we conduct IFRS training programs, along with other programs like XBRL. would like to connect with you. Please get in touch, Ravish +919820493348

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Maintenance Charges Default: No Water, No Sympathy

In what can only be described as a case of forum shopping (trying to find the friendliest court), an apartment owner in Shiv Vihar CHS, Dombivali (East), took his complaints on a legal tour. The petitioner, Vilas Gopal Dongare member of the society was unhappy. Why? Because his water supply was cut off. The reason? He had not paid his maintenance bills, which had piled up to a whopping Rs. 7 Lakhs! Despite making several complaints about the alleged harassment by the society and even a water tank causing structural issues in his building, his cries were heard and promptly dismissed. The Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission looked into his case and, on 05.02.2020, decided it was not a human rights violation. They said, “Pay your bills first.” The society initiated proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act) to recover arrears and got a Recovery Certificate issued in its favour. When the petitioner’s appeal against this certificate wa...

AMORTISED COST CALCULATION: THE EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE (EIR)

IAS 39 mandates some financial assets and liabilities to be subsequently measured at ‘amortized cost’.  This measurement concept is a management theory put in accounting practice. It means that the contractual interest rate each period should be adjusted to amortize the transaction costs over the expected life of the financial instrument. The amortization is calculated on an effective interest rate (EIR) / yield-to-maturity (YTM) basis. The EIR is the rate that exactly discounts the stream of principal and interest cash flows excluding any impact of credit losses, to the initial net proceeds. It is important to note that EIR method does not take into account any future credit impairments anticipated on that instrument. The carrying amount of the financial instrument subsequently measured at amortized cost is computed as: Transaction costs are an integral part of the amortized cost calculation. They are defined as costs that are directly attributable to the acquisit...

Court Upholds Co-operative Membership Transfer with Release Deed

In the case of Bima Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Divisional Joint Registrar & Ors. WP 10768 of 2024 , the Bombay High Court on 23.09.2024 dismissed the society’s petition challenging the membership transfer to Pushpa Morey, a widow, following her husband's death. Initially, Pushpa was granted provisional membership but was later denied full membership by the society. Pushpa applied for full membership after her husband's passing. When the society refused, she sought help from the Deputy Registrar, who ordered that the society admit her as a full member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The society’s appeal to the Divisional Joint Registrar was unsuccessful, prompting the writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The society argued that the "family arrangement" concept under Section 154B-13 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act applies only to a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Pushpa, however, contended tha...