Skip to main content

The Opening IFRS Balance Sheet

Adopting International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) present challenges that many people underestimate. The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on November 24, 2008 has issued Reconstructed version of IFRS 1: First Time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards applicable to the entities on or after January 1, 2009 although earlier application is permitted. The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has issued Ind- AS 41 talking about the transition requirements on the lines of IFRS 1 (Revised).

When a company prepares its first IFRS financial statements for the year ending 31st March 2012 with one year comparatives, the date of transition to IFRS will be 1st April 2010 and the opening IFRS balance sheet will be prepared at that date. A company required to present two full years of comparative information should prepare an opening balance sheet at 1st April 2009. The opening IFRS balance sheet is the starting point for all subsequent accounting under IFRS.

An entity in its opening balance sheet shall:
• Recognize all assets and liabilities whose recognition is required by IFRSs (e.g. derivative financial instruments);
• Not recognize items as assets and liabilities if IFRS do not permit such recognition (e.g. general reserves);
• Reclassify items that it recognized in accordance with previous GAAP as one type of asset, liability or component of equity, but are a different type of asset, liability or component of equity in accordance with IFRS (e.g. netted-off assets where netting is not permitted);
• Apply IFRSs in measuring all recognized assets and liabilities (e.g. impairments of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets)

The exception to this is where one of the optional exemptions or mandatory exemptions does not require or permit recognition, classification and measurement in accordance with IFRS.

The adjustments as a result of applying IFRS for the first time are recorded in retained earnings or another equity category. For example, a company that is required to re-measure available-for-sale (AFS) investment to fair value should recognize the adjustment in the AFS reserve. Similarly if a company elects to adopt a revaluation model in IAS 16 should recognize the difference between the cost and fair value of property, plant and equipment in the revaluation reserve. Companies might also be required to consolidate entities that were earlier not consolidated under the local GAAP. Companies will be required to consolidate any entity over which it is able to exercise control. Subsidiaries that were previously excluded from the group financial statements are consolidated as if they were first time adopters on the same date as the parent. The difference between cost of the parent’s investment in the subsidiary and subsidiary’s net assets under IFRS is treated as goodwill.

The deferred tax and minority interest balance included in the opening IFRS balance sheet will be dependent on other adjustments made. These balances should therefore be calculated after all adjustments are made.

The preparation of opening IFRS balance sheet may require the calculation and /or collection of information which was not calculated earlier in our local GAAP. Converging to IFRS will be a bigger change for some companies than for others. With mandatory transition proposed to begin in 2011, it makes sense for management to start sizing up the volume and variety of financial, business, tax, and operational changes—the objective being to avoid a resource demanding effort at the eleventh hour. Perhaps just as important, sufficient lead time will allow companies to discover transition-related changes which have the potential to deliver future dividends, such as overhaul of an inflexible information technology system or rethinking of accounting choices and not just treating them as a compliance exercise. The earlier we begin, the greater the benefits are likely to be.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Maintenance Charges Default: No Water, No Sympathy

In what can only be described as a case of forum shopping (trying to find the friendliest court), an apartment owner in Shiv Vihar CHS, Dombivali (East), took his complaints on a legal tour. The petitioner, Vilas Gopal Dongare member of the society was unhappy. Why? Because his water supply was cut off. The reason? He had not paid his maintenance bills, which had piled up to a whopping Rs. 7 Lakhs! Despite making several complaints about the alleged harassment by the society and even a water tank causing structural issues in his building, his cries were heard and promptly dismissed. The Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission looked into his case and, on 05.02.2020, decided it was not a human rights violation. They said, “Pay your bills first.” The society initiated proceedings under Section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act) to recover arrears and got a Recovery Certificate issued in its favour. When the petitioner’s appeal against this certificate wa...

AMORTISED COST CALCULATION: THE EFFECTIVE INTEREST RATE (EIR)

IAS 39 mandates some financial assets and liabilities to be subsequently measured at ‘amortized cost’.  This measurement concept is a management theory put in accounting practice. It means that the contractual interest rate each period should be adjusted to amortize the transaction costs over the expected life of the financial instrument. The amortization is calculated on an effective interest rate (EIR) / yield-to-maturity (YTM) basis. The EIR is the rate that exactly discounts the stream of principal and interest cash flows excluding any impact of credit losses, to the initial net proceeds. It is important to note that EIR method does not take into account any future credit impairments anticipated on that instrument. The carrying amount of the financial instrument subsequently measured at amortized cost is computed as: Transaction costs are an integral part of the amortized cost calculation. They are defined as costs that are directly attributable to the acquisit...

Court Upholds Co-operative Membership Transfer with Release Deed

In the case of Bima Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. v. Divisional Joint Registrar & Ors. WP 10768 of 2024 , the Bombay High Court on 23.09.2024 dismissed the society’s petition challenging the membership transfer to Pushpa Morey, a widow, following her husband's death. Initially, Pushpa was granted provisional membership but was later denied full membership by the society. Pushpa applied for full membership after her husband's passing. When the society refused, she sought help from the Deputy Registrar, who ordered that the society admit her as a full member under Section 22(2) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The society’s appeal to the Divisional Joint Registrar was unsuccessful, prompting the writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The society argued that the "family arrangement" concept under Section 154B-13 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act applies only to a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). Pushpa, however, contended tha...