Skip to main content

Posts

Day 1 Profit or Loss

The transaction price (i.e. consideration given towards assets and consideration received towards liabilities) is normally the best evidence of the fair value of a financial instrument at initial recognition. An exception to this general rule exists where the fair value of an instrument is evidenced by comparison with other observable current market transactions in the same instrument (i.e. without modification or repackaging) or based on valuation technique whose variables include only data from observable markets. Where there is strong, market-based evidence of the fair value of the financial instrument, the instrument is initially recognized at the fair value and an immediate day 1 profit and loss may arise. Using unobservable inputs to calculate a fair value different to the transaction price on day 1 involves a high degree of subjectivity and therefore this cannot be used as fair value on initial recognition of a financial instrument. In such a situation, the instrument is in...

IFRS 7 – FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY

As a part of the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements, an entity should classify the financial instruments measured at fair value using a ‘fair value hierarchy’ that reflects the significance of the inputs used in making the measurements. IFRS 7 consist of fair value hierarchy in its required disclosures to increase the comparability and consistency. A new standard “Fair Value Measurements” by IASB is expected to come by April 2011 on the lines of Statement No. 157 or ASC 820 of the US GAAP as a part of joint project of FASB and IASB. As per existing IFRS 7, the fair value hierarchy has three different levels: Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. A quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and should be used to measure fair value whenever available, except as follows: In some situ...

Revised Schedule VI

http://mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/Schedule_VI_28feb2011.pdf The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has issued a revised Schedule VI to the Companies Act 1956 on the 28th February 2011. This revised Schedule VI has nothing to do with the converged Indian Accounting Standards (IND AS) as notified by the Ministry earlier. The Schedule has been framed been framed as per the existing non-converged Indian Accounting Standards (AS) notified under the Companies (Accounting Standards) Rules, 2006. This Schedule will apply to all the companies registered with ROC for the financial statements to be prepared for the financial year 2010 - 2011 and onwards. The highlights of the Revised Schedule VI is as follows: 1. Applies to all companies following non-converged Indian Accounting Standards 2. No possibility of conflict between Accounting Standard and Schedule VI as on modification of accounting standards prescribed under the companies act, Schedule VI would stand modified accordin...

Govt deferred IFRS implementation

http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/finance/govt-deferred-ifrs-implementation/articleshow/7578251.cms A news article in Economic Times - 26 February 2011 which states that as per the press note of MCA dated 25-02-2011 the implementation of IFRS will miss the deadline of 1-April-2011 but is sure to come some day......;). Hopeful still coz the headline reads deferred and not cancelled!!!! The government has deferred the implementation of international financial reporting standards , acknowledging industry demand to extend the April 1 deadline to remove ambiguities on taxation issues. The decision has come as a relief for over 300 large companies, which were to submit their financials as per the global accounting standards, commonly called IFRS. The ministry of corporate affairs on Friday said it remained committed to the transition as it notified 35 accounting standards that are in line with IFRS. “After detailed consultations, it was felt necessary that industry should be g...

Indian Accounting Standards Converged with IFRS Notified

http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=70248 Finally, we have a press note specifiying that the Converged Indian Accounting Standards (IND AS) are notified by MCA dated 25-February 2011. The IND ASs (35 standards notified) are converged with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The verbatim script of the press note as released by the MCA is as under: QUOTE Reliable, consistent and uniform financial reporting is important part of good corporate governance practices worldwide in order to enhance the credibility of the businesses in the eyes of investors to take informed investment decisions. In pursuance of G-20 commitment given by India, the process of convergence of Indian Accounting Standards with IFRS has been carried out in Ministry of Corporate Affairs through wide ranging consultative exercise with all the stakeholders. Thirty five Indian Accounting Standards converged with International Financial Reporting Standards (henceforth called IND AS) are being notif...

IFRS in India from 1-April-2011

Source: http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=69867 Ministry of Corporate Affairs 17-February, 2011 16:56 IST Convergence of Indian Accounting Standards with International Financial Reporting Standards Availability of essential financial information about a company to its shareholders and other stakeholders in accordance with internationally accepted financial norms is considered as an integral and important part of good corporate governance. To ensure this and to implement the G-20 commitment to achieve a single set of high quality global accounting standards, the Government has taken a decision to achieve convergence of Indian Accounting Standards with IFRS in a phased manner beginning with April, 2011 in accordance with the roadmap suggested by Core Group and Technical Groups set up by the Government. India's commitment to the policy of 'convergence' of Indian Accounting Standards with IFRS would allow it to consider local economic conditions and environment whil...

What if India delays IFRS convergence?

The ministry of corporate affairs (MCA) has moved a cabinet note to amend the Companies Act of 1956 with the aim of converging Indian company law with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The government seems will go the ordinance way and clarity with regards to taxation still has to come in. CNBC-TV18's Menaka Doshi discussed the IFRS issue with Sir David Tweedie, Chairman of the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), Prabhakar Kalavacherla, member, IASB and TV Mohandas Pai, head, SEBI Sub-Group on IFRS and asked them if it would be a big deal if India was unable to meet the April 1 deadline. Below is a verbatim transcript of their interview. Also watch the accompanying video for more. Q: Are you happy with the fact that India has picked convergence over adoption? Tweedie: You have to choose what you want to do. Our mission is very simple; we have got to have one single set of global standards. It doesn't matter whether transaction takes place in...

ICAI lists companies for IFRS convergence

New Delhi, Nov. 13 The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has brought out a list of over 400 companies that should converge their accounting practices with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) by April 2011. IFRS — issued by International Accounting Standards Board — is acknowledged by 113 countries. This is ICAI’s first list and more companies would be added on its next list, sources said. The first list comprises 439 companies. It includes BSE-Sensex companies, NSE-Nifty companies, companies that have raised debt of over $50 million abroad, financial sector companies, publicly accountable companies (with total borrowings of over Rs 1,000 crore), Indian subsidiaries of foreign companies that have implemented IFRS at the parent company and companies outside these categories with capital of over $50 million abroad. Significantly, ICAI is mulling including venture capital funds also in the IFRS convergence process. The first list includes BSE and NSE compani...

Good read in Mint.....

The basic concepts underlying preparation of financial statements will undergo significant change upon implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in India. There are three key aspects that run through each principle laid down in IFRS: substance over form , fair value , and r ecognizing time value or time cost of money (present value) . These three items need to be understood carefully. Indian GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles), like any other GAAP, also recognizes the importance of substance over form. Accounting Standard 1 (AS-1) on “Disclosure of Accounting Policies” states that substance rather than form should be the guiding principle in selection and application of accounting policies. However, the true application of this principle will happen only under IFRS. That’s because IFRS is more contemporary and has prescribed the treatment for evolving issues. Also, unlike Indian GAAP, it does not recognize the concept of a legal override. Thus, IF...

IFRS Implementation in India

Implementation of the International Financial Reporting Standards, seem to have hit a roadblock due to differences between the Finance Ministry and Ministry of Corporate Affairs, reports CNBC-TV18's Aakansha Sethi quoting sources. CNBC TV18 had first broken this story where it was reported that the Ministry Of Corporate Affairs would be passing an ordinance to implement IFRS. The Minister for Corporate Affairs Salman Khurshid had also told CNBC-TV18 in an interview that IFRS would be implemented from the April 1, 2011. However this may not be possible now because of differences between the Finance Ministry and the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. Sources close to the development said there are two key differences. One is that the finance ministry says that implementation from April 1, 2011 is not possible because the accounting norms have not been notified as yet. This will only be done by December and in three months from January to March is too little to educate stakeholders and th...